Overview#

The Performance module covers goal setting (including true OKRs with key results), KPI tracking, structured review cycles (including 360-degree reviews), ad hoc feedback, Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), rating calibration, and competency/skill-gap tracking.

Purpose#

Show how goals, reviews, and feedback fit together across a review cycle, and what each role does at each stage.

Prerequisites#

  • An active review cycle, if you are participating in a formal review.

Step-by-Step Instructions#

Goals and OKRs#

  1. Create a goal, optionally nested under a parent goal (goals can be organized in a tree).
  2. For OKR-style goals, add key results under the objective.
  3. Log progress updates over time, and add comments for context.
  4. Submit the goal for approval where your organization requires it; your manager approves or rejects it.
  5. Mark the goal complete once achieved.

KPIs#

  1. HR or a manager assigns a KPI (from a template, or in bulk to a group) to an employee.
  2. Update the achievement value as it changes over the measurement period.

Reviews (including 360)#

  1. HR opens a review cycle and identifies eligible employees.
  2. A review is created using a review template with configurable questions.
  3. Depending on the review type — self, manager, skip-level, HR, or peer (360) — the relevant reviewers submit their responses.
  4. Once all responses are in, the review is locked and a final rating is set and finalized.
  5. Review history is visible per employee for future reference.

Feedback and PIPs#

  1. Give or request ad hoc feedback at any time, using a feedback template if desired.
  2. If performance concerns require formal action, HR or a manager creates a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) with milestones.
  3. Track the PIP status (active, on track, at risk, completed, or terminated) and update milestone status as they are met.
ⓘ
PIPs are always HR-visible

By design, PIP records are always visible to HR, regardless of who created them.

Calibration and competencies#

  1. HR runs a calibration session to review ratings across a group before they are finalized.
  2. Use the distribution check to see how ratings compare to a target curve — this only flags deviations, it does not automatically change anyone’s rating.
  3. Record calibration decisions and complete the session.
  4. Define competencies and levels, assign them to employees, and run a skill-gap report by employee or department.

Screens Involved#

📷
[Screenshot: Performance dashboard]
📷
[Screenshot: Goals (tree view)]
📷
[Screenshot: KPI management]
📷
[Screenshot: Reviews]
📷
[Screenshot: Review templates]
📷
[Screenshot: Feedback]
📷
[Screenshot: PIP tracker]
📷
[Screenshot: Calibration]
📷
[Screenshot: Competencies]
📷
[Screenshot: Review cycles]
📷
[Screenshot: Performance analytics]

Expected Results#

A traceable record of goals, review outcomes, feedback, and (where needed) improvement plans, with calibration providing a consistency check before ratings are finalized.

Not Available in This Release#

🚫
Not currently available
  • No automatic link between review outcomes and compensation changes (e.g., raises or bonuses) within this module.
  • No succession planning or 9-box grid tooling.
  • Calibration’s distribution check only flags deviations from a target curve — it does not auto-adjust ratings.
  • Performance analytics’ "attrition risk" view is a reporting dashboard based on existing data, not a predictive machine-learning model — do not present it to stakeholders as AI-driven prediction.

Common Mistakes#

  • Finalizing a rating before running calibration, when your process expects calibration first.
  • Assuming the distribution check will automatically fix a skewed rating distribution — it only flags it for a human decision.
  • Creating a PIP without adding milestones, making progress hard to track later.

Troubleshooting#

A 360 review is stuck waiting on responses.#

Check which reviewer type (self, manager, skip-level, HR, or peer) has not yet submitted. The review cannot be locked until required responses are in.

A goal cannot be marked complete.#

Confirm the goal has been submitted and approved, if your organization requires goal approval before completion.

FAQ#

What review types are supported?

Self, Manager, Skip-Level, HR, and Peer (true 360-degree). A review can combine multiple reviewer types depending on your template configuration.

Does calibration change my rating automatically?

No. Calibration’s distribution check flags how ratings compare to a target curve; a human still makes and records the final calibration decision.

Is the "attrition risk" score AI-generated?

No. It is a reporting view built from existing performance and HR data, not a predictive AI/ML model.

Best Practices#

  • Set goals early in a review cycle, not at the end, so progress updates mean something by review time.
  • Use calibration before finalizing ratings for any group review to keep ratings consistent across managers.
  • Attach concrete, dated milestones to every PIP.